Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 BR 816 - In Re Kay

In Re Kay’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2016

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 11 U.S.C. § 726

Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd. · Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.