State v. Duntz’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
155 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 155 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably Connecticut v. Porter (1997), State v. Oquendo (1992)
155 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon · Aguilar v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in a doubtful or marginal case. . .our constitutional preference for a judicial determination of probable cause leads us to afford deference to the magistrate's determination.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“may consider only the information that was actually before the issuing judge at the time he or she signed the warrant, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. . . . We view that information, however, in the light most favorable to the issuing judge's determination of probable cause, and [i]n a doubtful or marginal case . . . our constitutional preference for a judicial determination of probable cause leads us to afford deference to the magistrate's determination.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The role of an appellate court reviewing the validity of a warrant is to determine whether the affidavit at issue presented a substantial factual basis for the [issuing judge's] conclusion that probable cause existed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.