Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 CONN 41 - State v. Rivera

State v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably State v. Austin (1998), State v. Bruno (1996)

33 state decisions

200199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish · First National Bank v. United States · State v. Bitting · State v. Preyer · State v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that it was unreasonable as a matter of law for the jury to request, and the court to order, a replay of [a witness'] direct examination but not her cross-examination. He further argues that once the jury requested to rehear [another witness'] testimony, the trial court was obligated to replay her cross-examination, despite the jury's withdrawal of its request prior to rehearing any of her testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that the trial court acted within its discretion when it allowed the jury to rehear only that testimony that the jury indicated that it wished to rehear. We cannot conclude, as the defendant seems to advocate, that the trial court was required as a matter of law to replay more of the witnesses' testimony than the jury believed it needed to rehear in order to reach a verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.