Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 CTCL 281 - Acker v. United States

Acker v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
June 2015
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2015

901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 905 · 5 U.S.C. § 5921

Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Upper Pecos Ass'n v. Peterson · Witherspoon v. Illinois · March v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * [T]he construction of a statute by an agency charged with its administration is given deference and entitled to great weight. Udail v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 [ 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 ] (1965); Bowles v. Seminole Rock Co., 325 U.S. 410 [ 65 S.Ct. 1215 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 ] (1945); Crawford v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 128 , 142-43, 376 F.2d 266 , 274 (1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1041 [ 88 S.Ct. 781 , 19 L.Ed.2d 831 ] (1968). Moreover, the passage of time increases the assumption that Congress is aware of the agency interpretation of a statute and concurs in it, since no subsequent legislation has altered it. Benton v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 263 , 488 F.2d 1017 (1973); Alabama v. United States, 198 Ct.Cl. 683 , 461 F.2d 1324 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1023 [ 93 S.Ct. 464 , 34 L.Ed.2d 315 ] (1972). * * * »”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.