Hipple v. Bates County’s Empirical Analysis
223 F. 22 · 1915
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1929
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Lehnen v. Dickson · Supervisors v. Kennicott · City of Lexington ex rel. Menefee v. Commercial Bank · State ex rel. Vaughan v. Appleby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the proceedings in the city council progressed to the awarding of the contract, the rights of the contractors to payment could not be defeated by the expenditure thereafter of applicable county funds. Otherwise, a contract valid in all respects when made could be nullified by the subsequent acts of the statutory debtor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.