Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 F.1d 423 - Williams v. Potter

Williams v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

223 F. 423 · 1915

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
January 1917
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Molther · Williams v. Molther · Williams v. Potter · Williams v. Molther

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The courts have no authority to review the findings of the steamboat inspectors by appeal or writ of error. The most,they can do is to see that the inspectors act within, their jurisdiction, and that the Constitution and statutory rights of citizens are not impaired.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.