Hildreth v. Auerbach’s Empirical Analysis
223 F. 545 · 1914
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1939
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mast Foos Company v. Stover Manufacturing Company · Hildreth v. Lauer & Suter Co. · Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co. · Gleason v. Thaw · Doelger v. German-American Filter Co. of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““I must confess that the conception of the pins as ‘supports’ seems to me quite foreign to Dickinson’s disclosure.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mastoras v. Hildreth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.