Pittsburgh Consolidated Coal Company v. Harrison Construction Company, a Corporation, (Respondent), and Crain Bros., Inc., a Corporation, in Personam, and the Motor Vessel Clipper in Rem, Crain Bros., Inc., the Motor Vessel "Clipper", Her Engines, Tackle, Furniture and Equipment, American Barge Line Company v. Harrison Construction Company, a Corporation, and Crain Bros., Inc., a Corporation, in Personam, and the Motor Vessel "Clipper", in Rem, Crain Bros., Inc., the Motor Vessel "Clipper", Her Engines, Tackle, Furniture and Equipment, Pittsburgh Consolidated Coal Company, a Corporation v. Harrison Construction Company, a Corporation, (Respondent) and Crain Brothers, Inc., a Corporation (Respondent) in Personam, and the Motor Vessel "Clipper", in Rem. American Barge Line Company, a Corporation v. Harrison Construction Company, a Corporation (Respondent), and Crain Brothers, Inc., a Corporation (Respondent), in Personam and the Motor Vessel "Clipper", in Rem’s Empirical Analysis
223 F.2d 260 · 1955
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 1960
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As to the first issue there was ample evidence to support the finding of the court below that the towboat’s crew was. negligent in tying up the barges.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.