Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 F.2d 714 - Jackson v. King

Jackson v. King’s Empirical Analysis

223 F.2d 714 · 1955

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

75 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently February 2002 · most notably Smith v. Dunn (1955), Hicks v. Quaker Oats Co. (1981)

75 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

300195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1340

Relies on Commissioner v. Sunnen · Georgia v. Wenger · Nathan D. Goldberg and S. E. Wood, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · King v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, Rule 49(a) permits submission of special interrogatories to juries on issues of fact, but if an issue presents a mixed question of fact and law it may be submitted if the jury is instructed as to the legal standards to be applied; the form of the special issues should be such as not to mislead or confuse the jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence, if any, that at the time the contract sued upon was entered into, it was the meaning and intent of the parties thereto that W. O. Pelphrey was to be paid for the limestone rock crushed by him on the basis of $1.01 per cubic yard truck measurement? Answer `Yes' or `No'.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.