Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 F.3d 445 - Robinson Engineering Co., Ltd. Pension Plan & Trust v. George

Robinson Engineering Co., Ltd. Pension Plan & Trust v. George’s Empirical Analysis

223 F.3d 445 · 2000

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Reimer Express World Corporation (2000), United States v. Botefuhr (2002)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

450200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77L (§ 12 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77V (§ 22 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1965 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367

Relies on Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk · IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Herrmann · Grand Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc. · Gulf Coast Fans, Inc. v. Midwest Electronics Importers, Inc. · United States v. Indoor Cultivation Equipment from High Tech Indoor Garden Supply

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judgment is void for the purposes of Rule 60(b)(4) if the court that rendered it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or if it acted in a manner inconsistent with due process of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “All other process . . . may be served on any person in any judicial district in which such person resides, is found, has an agent, or transacts his affairs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “out of the same nucleus of operative fact”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.