Burnside v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
223 F.3d 840 · 2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381A (§ 1602 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Browning v. Sullivan · Woolf v. Shalala · Prosch v. Apfel · Kelley v. Callahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is experiencing pain; the real issue is how severe that pain is.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Maddox v. Massanari
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.