Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 FSUPP2D 156 - Cobell v. Norton

Cobell v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2004
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Elouise Pepion Cobell, et al. v. Gale A. Norton, Secretary of the Interior, et al. · Casey v. Lewis · Texas v. New Mexico · Connecticut v. Hamilton · Orscheln Bros. Truck Lines, Inc. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is sufficient that the Court Monitor has advised this Court regarding his meetings and discussions with third parties and has always informed this Court about the nature, extent, and substance of such meetings and discussions upon request.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “failed to provide sufficiently detailed information about the work performed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.