¶1This is purely and simply an effort to correct- alleged errors of law in a case heretofore affirmed in Epperson v. State, 223 Ga. 253 (154 SE2d 237), and the writ of habeas corpus is not available to applicant for a second review. Morris v. Aderhold, 201 Ga. 533 (40 SE2d 747); Peppers v. Balkcom, 218 Ga. 749 (130 SE2d 709). The judgment remanding the applicant to the custody of the proper State officials must be affirmed.
¶2Judgment affirmed.