Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 Ga. App. 164 - State v. Diamond

223 Ga. App. 164 - State v. Diamond’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2014

22 state decisions

130199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 217 Ga. App. 609 - Allenbrand v. State · 187 Ga. App. 765 - Pupo v. State · 220 Ga. App. 169 - State v. Goodman · 186 Ga. App. 87 - State v. Adams · 219 Ga. App. 5 - State v. Whitfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An officer may conduct a brief investigatory stop of a vehicle if such stop is justified by specific, articulable facts sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct. The specific articulable suspicion must be based on the totality of the circumstances — objective observations, known patterns of certain kinds of lawbreakers, and inferences drawn and deductions made by trained law enforcement personnel. 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When we review a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, the evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment of the trial court; the trial court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility are adopted unless they are clearly erroneous and will not be disturbed if there is any evidence to support them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This Court has specifically determined that an officer's observation of a motorist's `weaving' may serve as sufficient reason to warrant an investigative stop for a possible DUI violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.