Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 Ga. App. 515 - Hooper v. State

223 Ga. App. 515 - Hooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ledesma v. State · 155 Ga. App. 840 - Carter v. State · 182 Ga. App. 26 - Hayes v. State · 223 Ga. App. 346 - Davis v. State · 206 Ga. App. 459 - Sarver v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute does not require a written order for such a condition to have effect. The fact that the instruction was given and received, not that it was physically memorialized, is the focal point. Of course, a written instruction, acknowledged in writing by a defendant, is much preferred because it forecloses the issue and precludes any doubt. Its absence might be decisive in doubtful cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A person commits the offense of aggravated stalking when such person, in violation of a . . . temporary restraining order, . . . follows, places under surveillance, or contacts another person at or about a place or places without the consent of the other person for the purpose of harassing and intimidating the other person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.