Ure v. Ure’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024 · most notably Barnard v. Michael (1945), Mackenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co. (1924)
5 federal appellate · 48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McJilton v. Love · Snyder v. Snyder · Henderson v. Hatterman · Huston v. Tribbetts · Dean v. O'Meara
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * a party to a suit is presumed to know of all the errors in the record, and such party cannot acquire any rights or interests based on such erroneous decree that will not be abrogated by a subsequent reversal thereof. If such party has received benefits from the erroneous decree or judgment, he must, after reversal, make restitution, and, if he has sold property erroneously adjudged to belong to him, he must account to the true owner for the value. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.