Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 Ind. 217 - Holt v. State

Holt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2011

16 state decisions

7019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marks v. State · Gillespie v. State · Butler v. State · Armentrout v. State · State v. Beckwith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is contended that a defendant may stand mute and take advantage of irregular or erroneous rulings or directions of the court.” “Here, the appellant, although present in court, did not object to the discharge. Furthermore, the discharge of the jury was part of the relief granted on appellant’s own motion for a continuance, although the motion did not request such discharge. “This Court has held that where a defendant is in court and there is no showing that he objected to the discharge of the jury, he is presumed to have consented.” “In the instant case, the defendant was present in court and requested the continuance. The court granted greater relief than was contemplated in the motion, but the defendant was the one that requested the continuance and thus set in motion the very action upon which complaint is made. Under such circumstances, the defendant cannot be excused from objecting, and failure to do so must be taken as a consent to the action of the court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.