State v. Gilder’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2002 · most notably State v. McDaniel & Owens (1980), State v. Myrick & Nelms (1980)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on M. Morrin & Son Co. v. Burgess Construction Co. · Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist · State v. Childers · State v. Masqua · State v. Brunner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Furthermore, prejudice must be established ‘not as a matter of speculation but as a demonstrable reality.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. May · State v. Case““[T]he test of insanity of an accused precluding his being put on trial for a criminal offense is his capacity to comprehend his position, understand the nature and object of the proceedings against him and to conduct his defense in a rational manner. Stated in different fashion, if the accused is capable of understanding the nature and object of the proceedings going on against him; if he rightly comprehends his own condition with reference to such proceedings, and can conduct his defense in a rational manner, he is, for the purpose of being tried, to be deemed sane, although on some other subject his mind may be deranged or unsound.” (p. 219.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Soles““A change of venue in a criminal case lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. [Citations omitted.] The burden of proof is cast upon defendant to show prejudice in the community which will prevent him from obtaining a fair and impartial trial. [Citations omitted.] Media publicity alone has never established prejudice per se. Defendant must show prejudice has reached the community to the degree it is impossible to get an impartial jury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. May
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.