Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 Md. 618 - Master v. Master

Master v. Master’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
3
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Webb (1981), Coleman v. State (1977)

2 district · 44 state decisions

100196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bachrach v. Washington United Cooperative, Inc. · Brashears v. Collison · Reddick v. State · Thomas v. Hardisty · Croyle v. Croyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The order of publication was in no way constructive notice to the wife. A proceeding to foreclose an equity of redemption in a tax sale is a proceeding in rem or quasi in rem and the Legislature, without affronting due process, could have provided that all interested parties, including residents, were to be brought before the court by publication. ... The Legislature, however, chose to require in Code (1957), Art. 81, Secs. 106 and 107, that residents of the State must be personally served by subpoenas and that only if there were returns of non est on two successive subpoenas against a named resident defendant, or one non est and an affidavit of evasion of service, could such a defendant be treated as a nonresident and served by publication. Since the wife was admittedly a resident, living at an address known to the complainants, and was not served, the court had neither the right nor the power to proceed against her interest in the property, and the order of publication was without effect as to it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It has been held that more than a mere prayer for declaratory relief is required in a pleading if the jurisdiction of the court to declare rights and status is to be invoked.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “made in the presence of children old enough to understand fully what was being said,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.