Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 Md. App. 128 - Johnson v. State

223 Md. App. 128 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Albrecht · Hall v. State · State v. Faulkner · Dishman v. State · 4 Md. App. 236 - State v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is well-established that a trial court is strongly encouraged to use the pattern jury instructions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he wise course of action is to give instructions in the form, where applicable, of our Maryland Pattern Jury Instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This Court has recommended that trial judges use the pattern instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.