Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 N.C. 520 - Parsons v. . Wright

Parsons v. . Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
September 1983
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 1983

18 state decisions

10019431950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Cartways are public roads in the sense that they are open to all who see fit to use them, although the principal benefit inures to the individual or individuals at whose request they were laid out. The term is used merely for the purpose of classification and to distinguish a class of roads benefiting private individuals who, instead of the public at large, should bear the expense of their establishment and maintenance. They are designated gwasi-public roads, and the condemnation of private property for such use has been frequently sus tained upon that ground as a valid exercise of the power of eminent domain. Cook v. Vickers, 141 N.C. 101 , 58 S.E., 740 ; Barber v. Griffin, 158 N.C., 348 , 74 S.E., 110 ; Waldroup v. Ferguson, 213 N.C., 198 , 195 S.E., 615 ; 50 C.J., 380, sec. 5. They are properly considered an auxiliary part of the public road system of the county, although they are distinguished from public highways proper. Cook v. Vickers, supra.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.