Davis v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co. · 151 N.C. App. 565 - Mark Group International, Inc. v. Still · 147 N.C. App. 722 - Corbin Russwin, Inc. v. Alexander's Hardware, Inc. · 203 N.C. App. 725 - Caldwell v. Smith · Leach v. Western North Carolina Rail Road
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Choice of law clauses specify which state’s substantive laws will apply to any arising disputes. Consent to jurisdiction clauses grant a particular state or court personal jurisdiction over those consenting to it, authoriz[ing] that court or state to act against him. ... [A] true forum selection provision^ goes one step further than a consent to jurisdiction provision. A forum selection provision designates a particular state or court as the jurisdiction in which the parties will litigate disputes arising out of the contract and their contractual relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.