State v. Painter’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2020
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Schroder · Waite v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The evidence disclosed in the bill of exceptions therefore corrects whatever error exists in the journal entry. In the case of State v. Schroder, 218 Neb. 860, 867 , 359 N.W.2d 799, 805 (1984), we said: “ ‘[W]hile a recital in a journal entry appearing in the transcript is presumptively true, an affirmative showing in the bill of exceptions that it is not true prevails over the presumption.’ ” See, also, Waite v. State, 169 Neb. 113 , 98 N.W.2d 688 (1959).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Temple
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.