223 N.Y. 612
119 N.E 1061
Decided April 2, 1918
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1918-04-02
Knight, deceased. The complaint alleged that the testatrix at the time she executed the will was not competent to make it; that the will was not executed in conformity with the laws of the state and that execution thereof was procured by duress, coercion, fraud and undue influence.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1918
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1918-04-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Caedozo, McLaughlin and Andbews, JJ., and Hogan, J., under provisions of section 1317 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Dissenting on ground that *613 error was committed in charging requests made by respondents’ counsel: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase and Pound, JJ. _