Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 Or. 347 - Hall v. Work

Hall v. Work’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2017

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

50196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Merchant · Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. Railroad · Swank v. Elwert · Massey v. Becker · Eade v. First Nat. Bank of Condon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The measure of damages, therefore, in an action of trover, unless plaintiff, by reason of the unlawful act of the defendant, has suffered some special loss or injury, which must be alleged, is the value of the property at the time of the conversion, with interest thereon... ."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"In any case where, in the opinion of the court, a motion for a directed verdict ought to be granted, it may nevertheless, at the request of the adverse party, submit the case to the jury with leave to the moving party to move for judgment in his favor if the verdict is otherwise than as would have been directed." 223 Or. at 349 , 354 P.2d at 838 n. 1.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"* * * After both parties had rested the defendant moved the court to withdraw from the jury the issue of punitive damages. The court was of the opinion that the motion should be allowed but at the request of the plaintiff, pursuant to ORS 18.140(2),[1] submitted the issue to the jury. * * *." 223 Or. at 349 , 354 P.2d at 838 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.