223 Or. App. 444 - State v. Veatch’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"a person has a right to call their lawyer and you're not supposed to make any inferences from that, since they have a right to do it. "And so the State's not even supposed to bring it up. They brought it up. The seven of us are going to totally ignore it, though they couldn't."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] jury would likely infer that a person arrested for DUII would not ask for an attorney unless he or she was concerned about failing the breath test-in other words, a jury would likely see it as a tacit admission of guilt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“nothing in the context diverted the jury's attention away from [the inference of guilt], we cannot say that it is unlikely that the jury drew it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.