223 So. 3d 37 - Waters v. Oliver’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · 341 So. 2d 332 - Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. · 623 So. 2d 1257 - Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. · Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Hae Woo Youn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“involve mental and physical pain and suffering, inconvenience, loss of intellectual gratification of physical enjoyment, and other losses of lifestyle that cannot be definitively measured in monetary terms,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When findings are based on determinations regarding the credibility of a witness, the manifest error-clearly wrong standard demands great deference to the trier of fact's findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“speculative in nature and cannot be fixed with mathematical certainty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.