Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 SW3D 372 - Ex Parte Lewis

Ex Parte Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 217th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Ex Parte Briseno · Ex Parte Thompson · In Re: Yokamon Laneal Hearn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hile there is significant expert opinion testimony, documentary materials, and lay testimony in this record that might support a finding of mental retardation, there is also sufficient evidence, including expert and lay opinion testimony, as well as written records, to support the trial court's finding that applicant failed to prove that he is mentally retarded. In such a situation, I defer to the trial court's credibility determinations and . . . adopt its ultimate findings of fact. Based on those findings and my independent review, I agree with the Court's decision to deny relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is not limited to one who is a state-licensed physician or psychologist”); id. at 376 (Womack, J., dissenting). . All of these statements are signed, but none is notarized, all merely purporting to be”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.