Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston))
Relationships
Relies on Potier v. State · Smith v. State · Howard v. State · Standefer v. State · De La Rosa v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] long line of cases has held that the ‘right to counsel’ under the Texas Constitution includes the right to pose proper questions during voir dire examination.” 223 S.W.3d 379, 381 (Tex.Crim.App.2007). Although the dissent in Jones suggested that the cases were wrongly decided, the majority stated that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he right of being heard ... carries with it the right of counsel to interrogate the members of the jury panel to the end that he may form his own conclusion, after his personal contact with the juror, as to whether in counsel's judgment he would be acceptable to him[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jacobs v. State“[T]he right to be heard at voir dire is a right to participate in the proceedings in a certain way.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jacobs v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.