Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 U.S. 349 - Lincoln Gas Electric Light Company v. City of Lincoln

Lincoln Gas Electric Light Company v. City of Lincoln’s Empirical Analysis

223 U.S. 349 · 1912

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
29
cited 29 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
October 1989
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 15 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions (29 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1989 · most notably Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (1939), Los Angeles Gas Electric Corporation v. Railroad Commission of California (1933)

20 federal appellate · 15 district · 13 state decisions

35019121920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smyth v. Ames · Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Wilcox v. Consolidated Gas Co. · Chicago Ry Co v. Wellman · City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We are all of opinion that a better practice is to refer the testimony to nome competent master, to make all needed computations, and find fully the facts. It is hardly necessary to observe that, In view of the difficulties and importance of such a caso, it is imperative that the most competent and reliable master, general or special, should be selected ; for it is not-a light matter to interfere with the legislation of a state in respect to tho prescribing of rates, nor a light matter to permit such legislation to wreck large property interests.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In this, as in every other legislative rate case, there are presented three questions of prime importance: First, the present reasonable value of the company’s plant engaged in the regulated business; second, what will be the probable effect of the reduced rate upon the future net income from the property engaged in serving the public; and, third, in ascertaining the probable net income, under the reduced rates prescribed, what deduction, if any, should be made from the gross receipts as a fund to preserve the property from future depreciation?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.