Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 U.S. 365 - Metropolitan Redwood Lumber Company v. Charles P Doe

Metropolitan Redwood Lumber Company v. Charles P Doe’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2014

4 district · 1 state decisions

501920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Providence Co v. Hill Manuf'G · Wesley Richardson v. Judson Harmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was then the duty of every other court, federal or state, to stop all further proceedings in separate suits upon claims to which the limited liability act applied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.