Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 U.S. 639 - Re Merchants' Stock & Grain Company et Als

Re Merchants' Stock & Grain Company et Als’s Empirical Analysis

223 U.S. 639 · 1912

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
28
cited 28 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 6 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions (28 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2001 · most notably United States v. United Mine Workers of America (1947), Penfield Co of California v. Securities & Exchange Commission (1947)

34 federal appellate · 6 district · 19 state decisions

2301912192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMerchants' Stock & Grain Co. v. Board of Trade (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · Worden v. Searls · Doyle v. London Guarantee & Accident Co. · In the Matter of the Petition of the Christensen Engineering Company for a Writ of Mandamus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The classification then depends upon the question as to whether the punishment is punitive in vindication of the court’s authority or whether it is remedial by way of a coercive imprisonment or a compensatory fine payable to the complainant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.