Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 Va. 41 - Clanton v. Commonwealth

Clanton v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2012 · most notably California v. Ramos (1983), LeVasseur v. Commonwealth (1983)

6 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

5001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stamper v. Commonwealth · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Liepelt · Coppola v. Commonwealth · Turner v. Commonwealth · Waye v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conduct in committing the offense was outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman, in that it involved torture, depravity of mind or aggravated battery to the victim,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “admonition of [a] trial court in the presence of [a] jury [makes] it known to the jury that the court [is] not satisfied as to the propriety of [an] argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Do not sentence the other inmates of the Virginia State Prison to death at the hands of Earl Clanton. Don't give him the chance to take somebody else's life,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.