Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 VA 736 - Roberts v. Roberts

Roberts v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 1994
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hudgins v. Hudgins · Alls v. Alls · Rosenberg v. Rosenberg · Plattner v. Plattner · Craig v. Craig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an excessively rigid application of the . . . rule would permit a wife, who wished to desert her husband, but also wished to claim spousal support from him, to institute a frivolous suit against him, based on charges for which she has no evidence, and thereafter to desert him. She could later amend her suit to claim a divorce on the ground of one year’s separation, but he would be barred from asserting her desertion as a defense to her claim for spousal support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.