Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 Wis. 2d 32 - Petrowsky v. Krause

223 Wis. 2d 32 - Petrowsky v. Krause’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2018

11 state decisions

50199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 214 Wis. 2d 605 - State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane County · 133 Wis. 2d 278 - Boltz v. Boltz · 111 Wis. 2d 1 - Burg v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc. · 214 Wis. 2d 596 - In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Usow · 127 Wis. 2d 71 - Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “applies to certain acts engaged in by 'an adult family member or adult household member against another adult family member or adult household member.' " Petrowsky v. Krause , 223 Wis.2d 32 , 588 N.W.2d 318 , 319 (Ct. App. 1998) (quoting Wis. Stat. Ann. § 813.12 ). The issue in Petrowsky was "who constitutes a 'household member' under the domestic abuse statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a person currently or formerly residing in a place of abode with another person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether a statute is ambiguous is [also] a question of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.