Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 223 W. Va. 828 - Robinson v. Pack

223 W. Va. 828 - Robinson v. Pack’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Robert J. and Billye S. Front, etc. (2013), W. Va. Board of Education and L. Wade Linger, Jr. v. Jorea M. Marple (2015)

45 state decisions

440200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[g'Jovernment officials performing discretionary functions are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Syllabus, in part, Bennett v. Coffman, 178 W.Va. 500 , 361 S.E.2d 465 (1987).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'interlocutory orders which are made appealable by statute or by the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, or ... [which] fall within a jurisprudential exception' such as the 'collateral order' doctrine.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] circuit court's denial of summary judgment that is predicated on qualified immunity is an interlocutory ruling which is subject to immediate appeal under the 'collateral order' doctrine.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.