223 W. Va. 838 - State v. Adkins’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · 169 W. Va. 191 - State v. Hatfield · 207 W. Va. 640 - State v. Vance · 185 W. Va. 422 - State v. Julius · Halstead v. Horton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The traditional appellate standard for determining prejudice for discovery violations under Rule 16 of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure involves a two-pronged analysis: (1) did the non-disclosure surprise the defendant on a material fact, and (2) did it hamper the preparation and presentation of the defendant’s ease.” Syllabus Point 2, State ex rel. Rusen v. Hill, 193 W.Va. 133 , 454 S.E.2d 427 (1994).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.