¶1Order granting injunction pendente lite reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the record presented, we are of opinion that the ordinance was valid in its adoption, both as to procedure (People ex rel. Locke v. The Common Council of the City of Rochester, 5 Lans. 11), and as to the exercise of the police power. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur.
224 A.D. 663
Sharp v. Dalton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1928
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1928-05-15
Relies on People ex rel. Locke v. Common Council of Rochester
Decided 1928-05-15