Ex Parte Cullinan’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably Ware ex rel. Ware v. Turner (2002), Guaranty Funding Corporation v. Bolling (1972)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Davidson Bros. Marble Co. v. United States ex rel. Gibson · Rorick v. Stilwell · Sweeney v. Tritsch · Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is obvious that an appearance made for a special purpose ought not to be held to give the court jurisdiction over the defendant, except to the extent of hearing and determining the question which he specially presents to it for consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Haisten
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.