Ham v. Ham’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1968
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morgan v. Morgan · Haley v. Haley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a genuinely contested case the corroborating proof may be relatively slight, since the purpose of this requirement is to prevent collusion.” (Citing Morgan v. Morgan, 202 Ark. 76 , 148 S. W. 2d 1078 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sowards v. Sowards
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.