Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

224 Ark. 651

278 S.W.2d 126

West v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 9, 1955

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1955-05-09

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1955-05-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2004 · most notably Davis v. Ralston Purina Company (1970), 2 Ark. App. 150 - Davis v. C & M TRACTOR CO. (1981)

26 state decisions

100195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice

¶1(concurring on Rehearing). I joined in the dissenting opinion rendered in this case last February 28th, and I have not changed my view. Act 555, Section 2, is explicit in providing:

¶2“When an appeal is permitted by law from the Circuit, Chancery or Probate Court, any party to the action may appeal from a judgment or decree, by filing with the court in which the case is tried a notice of appeal within 30 days from the entry of the judgment or decree appealed from, unless a shorter time is provided by law. Failure of the appellant to take any of the further steps to secure the review of the judyment or decree appealed from shall not affect the validity of the appeal, but shall be ground only for such action as the appellate court deems appropriate, which may include dismissal of the appeal.”

¶3It is hard to understand how the language and its meaning could be any clearer. In my opinion, an appeal is taken when the thirty days notice of appeal is given, and this court has the authority under the Act to permit the cause to proceed to a final decision, even though appellants have not complied with other requirements of Act 555.

¶4When the facts and circumstances in the cases mentioned in the opinion on rehearing are taken into consideration, I think it would be an abuse of discretion to dismiss the appeals. Hence, I concur in the opinion on rehearing permitting the cases to proceed to decisions on the merits.

/224/ark/651 · .json · Public domain