Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 Ark. 929 - Corruthers v. Mason

Corruthers v. Mason’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 1976

13 state decisions

80195519601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Arkansas Valley Cooperative Rural Electric Co. v. Elkins · Froman v. J. R. Kelley Stave & Heading Co. · Ward v. George · Steward v. Thomas · McMahon v. Dekraay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the light of this evidence, we hold that a Jury question was made as to the status of Essie Mason— that is whether she was a fare paying passenger on the one hand, or a guest or joint adventurer on the other. In Albritton v. C. M. Ferguson, 197 Ark. 436 , 122 S.W.2d 620 , we held that a question of fact was made for the Jury as to the status of one of the occupants of the car. Likewise in Derrick v. Rock, 218 Ark. 339 , 236 S.W.2d 726 , we held that a question of fact was made for the Jury as to the status of one of the occupants of the car. A good case involving the Arkansas guest statute is that of McMahon v. De Kraay, * * * 70 S.D. 180 , 16 N.W.2d 308 * * *. “We hold that the Trial Court was correct in submitting to the Jury the question as to the status of Essie Mason, and that the instruction was good as against the objections made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.