In Re Lopez’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 11 U.S.C. § 722 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 1746
Relies on Mercer v. Monzack · In Re Anderson · In Re King · Pierce v. Industrial Savings Co. (In Re Pierce) · Terre Haute First National Bank v. Davis (In Re Davis)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An individual debtor may, whether or not the debtor has waived the right to redeem under this section, redeem tangible personal property intended primarily for personal, family, or household use, from a lien securing a dischargeable consumer debt, if such property is exempted under section 522 of this title or has been abandoned under section 554 of this title, by paying the holder of such lien the amount of the allowed secured claim of such holder that is secured by such lien.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Tripplett“If the court were not involved in the redemption process, these facts would not have come to the Court's attention. Court review of redemption agreements is necessary to determine the accuracy of statements contained in the agreements ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.