Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 F.1d 525 - In re Sage

In re Sage’s Empirical Analysis

224 F. 525 · 1915

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 1934
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1934

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

50191519201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sturges v. Crowninshield · Ogden v. Saunders · Acme Harvester Company v. Beekman Lumber Company · United States Fidelity Guaranty Company Appt v. Mj Bray · Byron Babbitt v. Howard Dutcher T

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As the pleadings showed the requisite jurisdictional fact as to domicile, the adjudication made thereon cannot be questioned collaterally.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.