Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 F.1d 554 - United States v. Murphy

United States v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

224 F. 554 · 1915

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 1968
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1968

7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

50191519201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Newhouse · Klemmer v. Mount Penn Gravity R. R. · Hewitt v. Gage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The law has specified who is to make the selection of jurors, and it is unsafe and unwise to permit a departure from its provisions. Courts cannot stop to inquire in each case whether such participation, however indirect, has been harmful in a given case. The only safe rule is to prohibit and condemn it absolutely.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.