De Hardit v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
224 F.2d 673 · 1955
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1999
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3045
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Rice v. Ames · Burnet v. Willingham Loan & Trust Co. · Kiker v. Commissioner · Wiggins v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Rule 3. The Complaint “The complaint is a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. It shall be made upon oath before a commissioner or other officer empowered to commit persons charged with offenses against the United States.” (Emphasis supplied.) “Rule 4. Warrant or Summons upon Complaint “(a) Issuance. If it appears from the complaint that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the defendant has committed it, a warrant for the arrest of the defendant shall issue to any officer authorized by law to execute it.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The complaint is a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. It shall be made upon oath before a commissioner or other officer empowered to commit: persons charged with offenses against the United States.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.