Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 224 F.3d 168 - Gary R. Wall and William Cooksey, Sr. v. Construction & General Laborers' Union, Local 230, John Pezzente, Dominick Lopreato, and Charles Leconche

Gary R. Wall and William Cooksey, Sr. v. Construction & General Laborers' Union, Local 230, John Pezzente, Dominick Lopreato, and Charles Leconche’s Empirical Analysis

224 F.3d 168 · 2000

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably Nancy Kosakow v. New Rochelle Radiology Associates Pc (2001), Teamsters Employers Welfare Trust of Illinois v. Gorman Brothers Ready Mix

3 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

180200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck · Reed v. United Transportation Union · Cornwell v. Robinson · Detroy v. American Guild of Variety Artists · Cerbone v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do note that the state law claims might be reframed as Section 301 claims. However, appellants made no effort to assert them as federal claims even when they were represented by counsel and when the Union had asserted the defense of preemption. We leave to the sound discretion of the district court whether, on remand, to allow appellants leave to replead the claims in question as arising under federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(i) `the defendant made a definite misrepresentation of fact, and had reason to believe that the plaintiff would rely on it'; and (ii) `the plaintiff reasonably relied on that misrepresentation to his detriment.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “inextricably intertwined with consideration of the terms of a labor contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.