Samson Dubria v. Ga Smith’s Empirical Analysis
224 F.3d 995 · 2000
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably State v. Elnicki (2005), Koerner v. Grigas (2003)
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 15 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Bruton v. United States · Estelle v. McGuire · Lindh v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`suggested in a variety of ways they did not believe [the defendant],'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[they were not the type of statements that carry any special aura of reliability [with the jury].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sweet v. State · State v. Demery“[E]ven if it was error to admit the tapes and transcripts without redacting Detective Detar's statements, any error was cured by the judge's two cautionary instructions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Demery
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.