Wilson v. McQueen’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably 25 Cal. 3d 813 - Lugosi v. Universal Pictures (1979), Carson v. Here's Johnny Portable Toilets, Inc. (1983)
6 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 117 Ga. App. 488 - McQueen v. Wilson · Williams v. Keebler · Bailey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“.. ,[I]t is manifest that the General Assembly intended that a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable judgment complained of, except where there is filed (1) a motion for new trial, (2) a motion in arrest of judgment, or (3) a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.” Wilson v. McQueen, 224 Ga. 420, 421 ( 162 SE2d 313 ). The granting of summary judgment was an appealable order under Code Ann. § 81A-156 (h) and a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable decision or judgment complained of . . . but when a motion for new trial, or a motion in arrest of judgment, or a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict has been filed, the notice shall be filed within 30 days after the entry of the order granting, overruling, or otherwise finally disposing of the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.