Walner v. Capron’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 1980 · most notably 125 Ind. App. 76 - Slinkard v. Babb, Wilson (1954), Dahlberg v. Ogle (1977)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Angeline Lombardo · Engleman v. State · Robertson v. Van Cleave · Thompson v. State · Ferguson v. Boyd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. Every bill of exceptions tendered prior to the filing of the transcript in the appellate tribunal shall, if correct, be signed by the judge and filed with the-clerk, which filing may be evidenced by an . order book entry or the clerk’s certificate. . , .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Rule 2-3 was made for the purpose of simplifying the filing of a bill of exceptions. It provides that the filing may be evidenced by an order book entry or by a certificate of the clerk. In the instant case it is shown by the clerk’s stamp, as having been filed with the clerk in open court on the date it was sealed and made a part of the record by the •judge. While this may not be the best way to show a filing with the clerk, we believe it is sufficient as it conclusively shows that it was delivered to the clerk for filing and by him filed in open court on the day it was settled and sealed by the judge.” ( 224 Ind. at 274 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.